Skip to main content
In Backlog

[resource status] sql filtering instead of checkboxes

Related products:Infra Monitoring - Monitoring
  • May 15, 2025
  • 9 replies
  • 77 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+11

Currently, in version 24.10, if you want to filter results using the "filter options," it's unfortunately impossible to create a simple "sql-like" rule since you must click on each checkbox in the results drop-down list.

This is particularly problematic if you want to select multiple results.

 

Today, searches on the new "resource status" pages are still catastrophic, rendering these new pages unusable.

 

It's necessary to add a "select all" button or simply display the search results if no checkbox is selected.

 

In the meantime, please maintain the good deprecated pages and definitely don't delete them in 25.10. The "resource status" pages are still far too far from matching the deprecated pages and are unusable because they lack too much basic functionality for users.

 

 

Thanks a lot

9 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • Centreonian
  • May 16, 2025
NewDiscussion ongoing

fmattes
Centreonian
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • Centreonian
  • May 16, 2025

Hi, thanks for your interest in Centreon and for your feedback.

Dis you try to filter direclty in search bar, using CQL ? https://docs.centreon.com/docs/alerts-notifications/resources-status/#search-bar

It should allow you to apply SQL-Like filtering

In a more global way, are you interested to discuss with Product team about Resource status gaps that would have not been taken into account/planned ? 

Thanks


Forum|alt.badge.img+11
  • Author
  • Builder *
  • May 16, 2025

@fmattes 

Unfortunately, not, the general search field also doesn't allow filtering by SQL syntax (like %).

It is true that in the search field I can now directly use the term gpon.*ONT (CQL/Regex) to obtain the equivalent of gpon%ONT which partly does the trick.

However, in the filter options, you must continue to use sql like commands with the problem that I initially raised with the checkboxes.

 

Yes, I'd be happy to discuss this with you. Feel free to contact me by private message.

Thank you very much and with my best regards


fmattes
Centreonian
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • Centreonian
  • June 13, 2025

Hi, i sent you a private message to book a meet and discuss this topic. Did you receive it ? 

Regards


Forum|alt.badge.img+11
  • Author
  • Builder *
  • June 13, 2025

Bonjour Florian,

oui nous avons rdv le vendredi 20 juin à 11h.

Belle journée


fmattes
Centreonian
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • Centreonian
  • June 13, 2025

Bonjour Florian,

oui nous avons rdv le vendredi 20 juin à 11h.

Belle journée

Mes excuses, c’était en effet bien confirmé de mon côté :)


Forum|alt.badge.img+13
  • Builder **
  • June 30, 2025

+1 for keeping the «old» status pages.

They are 10x faster than the Resources and really easy to use.

Many on our users don’t want to use the Ressources page.


rchauvel
Centreonian
Forum|alt.badge.img+18
  • Centreonian
  • July 11, 2025
Discussion ongoingIn Backlog

Alexandre Belhomme
Forum|alt.badge.img+13

+1 for keeping the «old» status pages.

They are 10x faster than the Resources and really easy to use.

Many on our users don’t want to use the Ressources page.

I would say that performance is greatly impacted by the amount of data that you are pulling on the resource pages. The amount of lines and columns that you grab can drasticly impact the performance of the page and the time to load.

If it’s really just about the page use, there was an export feature that was just pushed (from what i read) to export data from the resource status page.

I also have lots of users that are used to the deprecated pages, but i believe the CQL with regex support is a good idea to provide more flexibility instead of maintaining many dataview pages.