Build better products with our product team.
Based on the next discussion. When i was digging to create custom commands for my users, i realized that you can give description to command Arguments, but not to Macros.For Macros you either need to be very descriptive in your naming, provide example in the proper field, or provide external documentation about the usage.I would like to be able to provide description to macros, either on the CMD, STPL or HTPL level, as you can define new macros at each of those steps. Within this evolution, would love to be able to export all this new data within the AWIE module (import/export) so it can be integrated in multiple instances if needed. On the Command level, we already have fields stored when edited on the web interface but not on the CLAPI as per the next page. On the Host and Service template level, i belive that this small button has the same purpose, but the same way when exported the description is not exported (and we can’t set it through CLAPI) The objective would be to clarify the usage of each macro, their exceptions, etc. It can even (why not) contain a link to an external description if needed. The point is to reduce the amount of interaction required for the user to do to understand what information to place on the field when using Centreon. I would love your feedback on that idea.Thank you.
Hi everyone,I’d like to suggest an enhancement for the CSV export feature in Centreon.Currently, when exporting service or host lists to CSV, the file does not include the Host ID or Service ID, which are often needed when working with the API, automation scripts, or external integrations.Requested improvement:Add two optional columns to CSV exports: host_id service_id This would make it much easier to correlate exported data with REST API queries or configuration automation tools.
Hello, A nice feature would be to be able to use macros within custom macros.For example use $hostname$ in a URL like this in order to use the hostname do dynamically create the URL.Thanks in advance for the consideration.
We have some messages that we eliminate via an automatic restart during the night (e.g. C disks with warning, SWAP messages).If we work with acknowledgements and the problem has not been solved overnight, the alarm remains permanently acknowledged and we lose sight of this alarm.If we work with a downtime until the next morning at 05:00 (which we currently do), we do not notice if the C disk switches from Warning to Critical by then and may prevent users from continuing to work.
Bonjour, Nous avons un écran de supervision avec différentes “maps” dans la rubrique “Tableaux de Bord”, mais malheureusement, il n’y a pas de paramétrage précis sur le fait de retirer les services/hôtes du widget une fois l’acquittement effectué : Cela pourrait permettre de gérer notre supervision en temps réel afin d’avoir pour objectif le retrait des hôtes/services une fois qu’ils ont été acquittés. Merci d’avance. Cordialement, Nelson - Support Exaprobe
Hi, we are monitoring the reliability of WAN lines. We have a check, which measures the round-trip-time to a remote site and giving back the min, avg and max RTT.I’d like to have a graph, which draws the avg as a solid line (that’s easy) and I want to have the area between the min and max filled with a colour. For those, who know smokeping, I like this kind of display a lot!Maybe there are other use-cases, where a filled area between two metrics might be useful !?Would it be possible to fill the max metric as usual and restore background colour (erase the filling of the max) with the min metric?
Hi,Persona : adminsProblem to solve : It is not possible to reassign the owner of a dashboard. If this person leaves the company, it should be possible to assign their dashboards to another user.Expected outcome : Allow Centreon Admins to reassign the owner through the Dashboards forms.Potential solution : Add functionnality in the 3 dots menu of a dashboard. Regards
Hello,Just a very simple idea which, I believe, can be implemented very easily.Would you make this list sorted ?Thank you.Regards
Hello everyone,While working with Centreon Map, I realized that two features could significantly improve reliability and user comfort: Versioning / History of map changes It would be very helpful if Centreon Map could automatically keep a number of versions of a map after each modification. In case of a bug, visual corruption, or user error, it would allow us to easily roll back to a previous version. Recycle bin with delayed deletion When a map is deleted, it is removed permanently. A recycle bin, with a retention period of around 30 days before final deletion, would allow recovery of maps accidentally deleted. These two features would greatly increase safety and peace of mind when designing or maintaining maps.Thanks for reading, and feel free to share your thoughts!Regards
Veeam has released version 13, which is no longer compatible with the current Centreon connectors.In this version, access is only available through the REST API:https://helpcenter.veeam.com/references/vbr/13/rest/1.3-rev0/tag/LoginVeeam is now provided as a Linux appliance with specific command sets.Could you please consider updating the Centreon plugin to support this new version and its REST API access?
Hi,I’m trying to make graphs more stylish and better understandable.I have different metrics in one graph, showing i.e. packet loss in % and round-trip-time in ms.I want to scale the % packet loss fix from 0 to 100. The RTT should be scaled to max.I can only adjust the left y-axis with the graph template. I could not manage to do settings on the right y-axis.Why can I only do settings on the left? This should be possible on every metric independent on which axis it is shown.BRHorst
Today, Centreon users can monitor latency and throughput in real time via the Latencetech REST API plugin pack.The next step could be to move from reactive monitoring to proactive prediction.The idea is to create a “Latency Intelligence” layer inside Centreon that leverages Latencetech’s fine-grained metrics (latency, jitter, stability, volatility) to forecast degradations before incidents occur.By correlating these indicators with Centreon Business Activity Monitoring (BAM) views, users could anticipate SLA drifts and understand how network instability impacts service performance.Predictive alerts (“latency drift alerts”), QoE dashboards, and latency trend analytics would help network and IT teams reduce downtime, prevent service degradation, and enhance user experience.This innovation would position Centreon as a truly predictive observability platform, bridging technical and business perspectives — and turning monitoring into insight.
Hi,Persona : Admins and OpsProblem to solve : With a large number of dashboards, searching could be simplified with more sorting criteria.Expected outcome : Enhance search bar with criteria about owning and sharing.Potential solution : Redesign the search bar to add two criteria:1- Drop down list “Owners” (feature for administrators) : all dashboards owners2- Drop down list “Sharing” (feature for anyone) : “My dashboards” or “Dashboards shared with me”Regards 🙂
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK