Build better products with our product team.
Hello,When you hover mouse over a container object on a map a small pop-up window is displayed.When working a lot with Centreon MAP maps we found this pop-up window very annoying especially when you have a lot of containers on a map.I would like to ask you to add a possibility to disable this pop-up from displaying so we can make a decision if we need it or not.I hope this will not require a lot of changes.Best regards,Jarosław Kęsy
Same as this idea:This would be useful for building dynamic action_url links to automate remediation actions, or using notes_url to generate specific Wiki pages.
Hi,I’m trying to make graphs more stylish and better understandable.I have different metrics in one graph, showing i.e. packet loss in % and round-trip-time in ms.I want to scale the % packet loss fix from 0 to 100. The RTT should be scaled to max.I can only adjust the left y-axis with the graph template. I could not manage to do settings on the right y-axis.Why can I only do settings on the left? This should be possible on every metric independent on which axis it is shown.BRHorst
Hello everyone,Following the recent development of the new Rubrik GraphQL plugin (created to support the transition to Rubrik Security Cloud and the deprecation of local REST API accounts), we were able to successfully restore the monitoring of our Rubrik infrastructure. The current plugin already offers several very useful modes: cluster, compliance, disks, jobs, nodes, storage, tasks.The Need:However, we noticed a lack of visibility regarding system event logs. Recently, we had "System Critical Event" alerts that generated thousands of emails via RSCP, without triggering any alerts on the Centreon pollers side.Proposed Solution:It would be highly beneficial to add a new "events" mode (or equivalent) to the Rubrik GraphQL plugin. This mode would allow us to query the API specifically to monitor and retrieve critical events and warnings generated by the Rubrik system.Benefits for the community: Centralization of critical Rubrik alerts directly within Centreon. Prevents missing major incidents that are currently only notified via email. Provides a more comprehensive and proactive monitoring of Rubrik RSC infrastructures. Thank you in advance to the product and R&D teams for considering this feature request!
Hello,I’ve just realized there is a big gap in MAP web editor. There is no toolbox which contains the list of all objects (resources/containers) used on a map you are currently editing.With maps with a lot of objects it is almost impossible to conveniently and efficiently work on them.In the Legacy Map Desktop client resources and containers used on a map where nicely displayed in a toolbox on the left and you have an easy and quick access to them. By selecting a resource from the list a corresponding object on a map was selected. Now there is nothing like that in the new web editor.This is a huge disadvantage.Please, implement such toolbox. Thank you.
Hi,There is any plan to implement a Connector to OCI?Currently we are migrating our systems to this cloud provider and I can’t see a way to integrate with this cloud provider to get alarms and metrics.It is very similar to AWS and Azure implementation.We need to get informations for Load Balancer, Computer Instances, Kubernets(OKE), Databases Intances and Logs/Annoucements.All of this informations can be get with OCI's native tool oci-cli or API.https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/API/Concepts/cliconcepts.htm
Le message de fermeture de ticket dans Open Ticket devrait dépendre du provider parce que dans mon cas, j’utilise Service Now et la fermeture des tickets n’est pas comprise dans les options et les superviseurs sont confus à chaque fois qu’ils voient ce message :
Persona:Centreon administratorProblem to solve:In the current Linux SSH – Files-Size mode, thresholds are calculated based only on the raw directory size in bytes. For directories subject to operational "soft limits" or logical growth policies (where no system-level quotas are enabled), the lack of a reference capacity makes percentage-based monitoring impossible. This requires administrators to manually recalculate byte-based thresholds whenever a logical limit is adjusted.Current behavior:The plugin retrieves the directory size using the du command via SSH but does not provide a parameter to define a reference capacity. Thresholds are strictly compared against absolute byte counts, and no percentage usage is calculated in the status output or performance data.Expected outcome:Allow the plugin to use a user-defined "Logical Maximum Size" as an optional reference for threshold calculation. Users could choose between: Default: Thresholds based on the raw directory size in bytes. Optional: Thresholds based on a percentage of a manually defined --max-size. Potential solutions: Add a new option (e.g., --max-size) to define the 100% reference value (supporting units like G, M, or bytes). Add a new option (e.g., --use-percentage) to interpret warning and critical inputs as percentage values of the maximum size. Enhance performance data by populating the "max" field of the size metric and adding a dedicated size_prct metric. Update the status output to display the usage ratio (e.g., "Used / Max (Usage %)"). Benefits / Impact: Scalability: Enables the use of generic Service Templates where only a capacity macro is adjusted per host. Operational Clarity: Provides intuitive feedback (percentage of a limit) rather than raw byte counts for operators.
Hello,I would like the name of a token to appear in the Administration logs section of the Centreon Cloud platform, perhaps by adding an additional column or through another method.This feature would be appreciated, especially when you have multiple tokens in production.
Right now when a use is on Centreon and wants to create a host, the only component they can use to decide what to implement is the Template select field.This is a little bit raw to let users discover what they want to install.In a similar way as Connectors or the new wizard for pollers, i would like to be able to let users go in a cleaner interface to choose what template they are looking to implement.This could take many forms as it’s more related to how the UI would show the information to the user and i’m unsure how easily we can structure this from the list of templates.But this is my idea, to avoid the hassle of the user going through documentation to find what host template to use, to prefer to stay on the centreon and go through a wizard to choose what template to integrate. What does the community think of this ?
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK